Monday, January 24, 2011

Pin It

Widgets

Fatwa of the Day #9

Ladies, if you are considering converting to Islam—a decision I encourage you to make; for all the advantages you gain from being a woman in Islam—I recommend you read the following Fatwa which will make you think twice before visiting your beauty parlor again.

As always, the Egyptian Dar al-Ifta (Arabic for the “Home of Fatwa Issuing”), succeeded at making me shake my head in disbelief and laugh at the same time.
The following inquiry was submitted to their website urging them to advise on this extremely critical matter:

The Question: Is plucking one’s eyebrows considered a sin for Muslim women?

Eyebrow-Plucking-8
The Answer(s):

- According to one group of scholars: YES, IT IS DEFINETELY A SIN! Plucking one’s eyebrows and/or the eyebrows of another woman is absolutely prohibited in Islam. In order to back this ruling, Dr. Ali Goma Mohammed, the wise Muslim scholar who responds to these important questions—in the form of Fatwas, refers to the following saying in the Hadith:

Allah curses the women who perform tattoos, get tattos, the women who pluck the eybrows of others, and those women who get their eyebrows plucked, and part their teeth for adornment, who change Allah’s creation.


- the other group advocates for the following: If a woman is unmarried she is prohibited from plucking her eyebrows. On the other hand a married woman is permitted to do so on the conditions that her husband gives her permission, and that she does it for adornment purposes only (i.e. she plucks her eyebrows to make herself prettier and more attractive to her husband).

frida by iris schwartz

Having read that, I believe that unmarried young Muslim women who are going to remain celibate for quite some time, and who dislike their bushy eyebrows should simply get used to it. And who knows, maybe one day “unibrowness” might become the next fashion sensation!

frida-kahlo-frida-kahlo-172270_845_1181


Comments (13)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I wonder....
1 reply · active 740 weeks ago
Reading deeply in religious scripture and inquiring about their "lois de vie" will always keep you wondering ;)
I'm sure compulsive behavior is not considered praise-worthy in Islam, but I wonder if Allah would make an exception to this curse for women with trichotillomania.

Also, what does it mean to "part [one's] teeth for adornment"? I can't figure out if that refers to a large smile, or some sort of anti-orthodontics.
1 reply · active 740 weeks ago
I'm sure pulling your own hair out would not be viewed as a psychological disorder in that case; demon possession would definitely be attributed to it!

I tried to look up what is meant by "part their teeth for adornment", but couldn't find anything. So I checked the Arabic version of this Hadith; and after painstakingly trying to figure out what was meant by this expression, I was able to make sense of it.

The English translation is actually correct, by "parting" the teeth, it is meant to artificially create a gap between the central incisors. This was done for two reasons: First, because it was considered attractive; the second reason older women used to "part" their teeth was to bluff men into thinking they are young; young people have natural gaps between the incisors, because haven't grown their 3rd mollars (wisdom tooth) yet.

So, according to this Hadith, parting one's teeth—which was done using a metal filer— is prohibited.
When in doubt assume it is a sin!
Hello.
I have been reading some of your articles and I am frankly surprised (in a good way) that reasonable people exist even in countries where fundamentalism is a state policy.
Unfoortunately, my country also is heading to this, but on the orthidox-christian fundamentalism.
However, I am writing this comment in order to advise you on translating to English some of your sources and specially what you're going to crticize.
I would have wanted to read that inquiry but it is in Arabic and I can't read nor can I understand the Arabic language.

Anyway, keep up the good work!
Lucian Vâlsan, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
The problem is not the way that u think, which is somehow using logic, but extremism in "freedom" or in "prison", is extremism. Be free but not fanatic, in what do you believe, even if you dont agree, maybe he can be right, although I desagree with this, I can't say that he is wrong. Wrong and RIght are a dangerous things to say...because sometimes we are so sure that we are right, and to the surprise....after will appear...that maybe we are wrong. So don't be so sure, about your opinions, I am just trying to make you think in a more open way. Because be against "rules", do not means freedom, And accept those rules without thinking also is not freedom, but trying to understand both sides, maybe you will not be so "right-wrong", os making fun about someone's fatwa because YOU dont see logic on this, but believe me some people do see logic on this....so dont judge like :wrte or wrong...
I am just giving you an advice..thanks.
Moreover, you have to be impartial, try to show fatwas that don't agree with the fatwa of this sheik.....because is so easy to take some negative points of view...of some people....but trying yo hide the beautiful that all religions can have, is like you are not being truth, not with your readers but with yourself. Please dont be sad with me, but sometimes hard words, are better than nice words....dont take my advice as an offence.....
Be free even from your convictions....never be blind about an idea, because sometimes, the idea itself is blind.
sometimes you see things as an absurd......sometimes the absurd is the right thing....I am telling all this, with personal experience....I have been in many sides...fanatics, liberal....but believe me extremism in both sides is not the way,....
3 replies · active 696 weeks ago
Other scholars will most likely agree with Sheik Gomaa. Why? For the simple reason that you can not deny "sahih/Authentic" ahadith. And the prohibition against plucking your eyebrow hairs and making space between your teeth (then considered attractive), stem from such a hadith.

So if you are going to question what you consider authentic (as per scholary conclusion across the world) then you must essential also question other hadith and then the very dogmatic practice of Islam as we know will for the most part be questioned and lose their validity. It is like scholars today who seek to create doubt about underage brides (children) when there are at least 3 sahih ahadith collection by the leading ahadith compilers such as Bukhari, Muslim and Dawud stating child brides are permitted forget thet they by doing so open the gateway (which most havent caught on to as of yet blinded by the sheep syndrome not allowing for critical or independent thinking let alone interpretation) will other ahadith to be questions as well. And that will choke the power hold these scholars enjoy on the common muslim.
So the blog owner is not misleading not withholding the truth from readers. Readers should know this to begin with. If it comes as a surprise then you are not very knowledgeable about the Sunni Islam which you probably claim to practice. If you are Shia, then none of the above will apply.

That simple. So this attempt to discredit the blog owner is just absurd. I suggest if you have a problem, then there is nothing stopping you from contacting Sheik Gomaa.

A funny observation nowadays is though, that most scholars dont care whether the girl dress likes whores or nuns, as long as they cover their hair. The really funny thing is that all beauty (other than that naturall present) is only for the husbands eyes. So the very successful and compettive attempts by majority of the scarf bearing girls to follow fashion trends and vanity is against Islam - as per the Quran. A guy will turn more heads after a girl who plucks her eyebrows to form the perfect and prettiest of brows with skin tight fashionable outfits, piles of makeup and of course the bling and the perfume aroma than he would after a nun with bushy eyebrow, plain face and humble and neutral attire not emphasizing her curves.
Yet the scholars apparently are happy just with the heair coverage. The rest apparently dont matter to them and of course they know, the minute they try discourage girls against these basic but also apparent unislamic things, they will walk and - so alas they lose their chokehold.

Fatwas are funny yet dangerous. They have power because majority have chosen to give the authors of fatwas such power and chokehold. No room for critical thinking and independent and alternative interpretations because that will create a loss of power. But the blind can not see and the dead not hear. So eloquently expressed in the Quran.

People complain about people who post these fatwas. Have the guts to instead complaint directly to those who issue such fatwas. Egypt enjoys a very high position as far as fatwa issuing and islamic teaching is concerned. Up until late 1990s Al Azhar the most prestige and strong of all institutions where people go to from across the world, kept issuing fatwas allowing female circumcision. Until recent laws passed in Egypt the practice was considered Sunnah. Not obligatory but honourable for the woman as per - what do you know - Sahih ahadith. So there you go.

Post a new comment

Comments by

All Rights Reserved Free Thinking Lebanon